Complex numbers are just vectors, with an x-axis of the
real numbers and a y-axis of the imaginary −1
numbers. Of course, instead of a basic (x,y) or (r,θ),
we just need to include the basis vectors (the default units)
of our axes when we talk complex. In the x-axis, this is 1, and in the
y-axis, this is i=−1.
”Rectangular form” is obvious: a+bi comes from (x,y).
”Trigonometric form” is a bit funkier: r(cosθ+isinθ) comes from…?
Actually, it comes from a drawing of a triangle!
First, let’s draw out some complex number with
magnitude r and angle θ. Connect that
to the origin, and we can immediately SOHCAHTOA.
Of course, we can’t just leave things at rsinθ
and rcosθ; we need to attach the basis vectors
on. Now, the hypotenuse’s absolute value is r, but
Pythagorean Theoreming will give us an a+bi.
Trigonometric form isn’t really used to add complex
numbers, but it sure is used to multiply them. Why?
Well, trig identities give us the opportunity to
add angles, letting us escape a soup of expanded a+bi
binomials when we multiply. Let’s see where they come from!
z2z1z2z1=r2(cosβ+isinβ)r1(cosα+isinα) Rationalize the denominator!=r2(cosβ+isinβ)r1(cosα+isinα)∙cosβ−isinβcosβ−isinβ=r2r1((cosβ)2−icosβsinβ+isinβcosβ+(sinβ)2cosαcosβ−icosαsinβ+isinαcosβ+sinαsinβ)=r2r1((cosβ)2+(sinβ)2cosαcosβ+sinαsinβ+i(sinαcosβ−cosαsinβ))=r2r1(1cos(α−β)+isin(α−β))=r2r1(cos(α−β)+isin(α−β))
Between lines 4 and 5, we used the angle subtraction identities.
there is something else we have to consider: multiple solutions.
Usually, with some caveats, we prefer the “principal solution”
when solving for a real number’s root, i.e. 4=2 rather than 4=−2
However, with complex numbers we have to consider every root. −4=±2i
Let’s think about what this means, based on our exponentiation rule. Imagine
a complex number of some magnitude r0, that has an angle of 60°. z0=r0(cos(60°)+isin(60°))
If we want to find its cubic roots, we’ll need a complex number z=r(cos(θ)+isin(θ)) where r3=r0 and 3∙θ=60°.
But angles are modular! They wrap around a circle! 20°×3=60° 140°×3=420°≡60° 260°×3=780°≡60°
Because of the circle’s modulus of 360 degrees, we therefore
discover these properties for the solution angles of nz:
They’re spaced equally apart by n360
The smallest angle is nθ, and the largest angle must be below 360°
(because otherwise we’d just subtract 360° anyway).
Hence, unless you prefer to use 2π over 360°, our
final formula will look like this:
nz=nr(cos(nθ+kn360)+isin(nθ+kn360))
where integer
k≥0
and
k<n
(so that kn360 doesn’t surpass 360).